Emotion-Infused Models for Explainable Psychological Stress Detection

33Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The problem of detecting psychological stress in online posts, and more broadly, of detecting people in distress or in need of help, is a sensitive application for which the ability to interpret models is vital. Here, we present work exploring the use of a semantically related task, emotion detection, for equally competent but more explainable and human-like psychological stress detection as compared to a black-box model. In particular, we explore the use of multi-task learning as well as emotion-based language model fine-tuning. With our emotion-infused models, we see comparable results to state-of-the-art BERT. Our analysis of the words used for prediction show that our emotion-infused models mirror psychological components of stress.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"Why should i trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier

11825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking Rumination

3916Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mental Health Analysis in Social Media Posts: A Survey

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A mental state Knowledge–aware and Contrastive Network for early stress and depression detection on social media

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotion fusion for mental illness detection from social media: A survey

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turcan, E., Muresan, S., & McKeown, K. (2021). Emotion-Infused Models for Explainable Psychological Stress Detection. In NAACL-HLT 2021 - 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 2895–2909). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.230

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

76%

Researcher 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 33

83%

Linguistics 4

10%

Neuroscience 2

5%

Philosophy 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free