Can native T1 mapping differentiate between healthy and diffuse diseased myocardium in clinical routine cardiac mr imaging?

31Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives T1 mapping allows quantitative myocardial assessment, but its value in clinical routine remains unclear. We investigated, whether the average native myocardial T1 value can be used as a diagnostic classifier between healthy and diffuse diseased myocardium. Methods Native T1 mapping was performed in 54 persons with healthy hearts and in 150 patients with diffuse myocardial pathologies (coronary artery disease (CAD): n = 76, acute myocarditis: n = 19, convalescent myocarditis: n = 26, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM): n = 12, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM): n = 17) at 1.5 Tesla in a mid-ventricular short axis slice using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence. The average native myocardial T1 value was measured using dedicated software for each patient. The mean as well as the range of the observed average T1 values were calculated for each group, and compared using t-test. The ability of T1 mapping to differentiate between healthy and diffuse diseased myocardium was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). Results The mean T1 value of the group "healthy hearts" (955±34ms) differed significantly from that of the groups DCM (992±37ms, p<0.001), HCM (980±44ms, p = 0.035), and acute myocarditis (974±36ms, p = 0.044). No significant difference was observed between the groups "healthy hearts" and CAD (951±37ms, p = 0.453) or convalescent myocarditis (965±40ms, p = 0.240). The average native T1 value varied considerably within all groups (range: healthy hearts, 838-1018ms; DCM, 882-1034ms; HCM, 897-1043ms; acute myocarditis, 925-1025ms; CAD, 867-1082ms; convalescent myocarditis, 890-1071ms) and overlapped broadly between all groups. ROC analysis showed, that the average native T1 value does not allow for differentiating between healthy and diffuse diseased myocardium, except for the subgroup of DCM. Conclusions The average native T1 value in cardiac MR imaging does not allow differentiating between healthy and diffusely diseased myocardium in individual cases.

References Powered by Scopus

2014 ESC guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The task force for the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

3670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases

2593Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T <inf>1</inf> mapping of the heart

1092Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update

343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiac Fibroblast Activation in Patients Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Integration with MR Tissue Characterization and Subsequent Functional Outcome

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strain analysis for discrimination between hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goebel, J., Seifert, I., Nensa, F., Schemuth, H. P., Maderwald, S., Quick, H. H., … Nassenstein, K. (2016). Can native T1 mapping differentiate between healthy and diffuse diseased myocardium in clinical routine cardiac mr imaging? PLoS ONE, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155591

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

54%

Researcher 13

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

63%

Computer Science 4

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Neuroscience 3

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 23

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free