Reduced fine sediment flux and channel change in response to the managed diversion of an upland river channel

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of a novel mitigation approach and subsequent adaptive management, designed to reduce the transfer of fine sediment (< 2 mm) in Glaisdale Beck, a small, predominantly upland catchment in the UK. Hydro-meteorological and suspended sediment data sets are collected over a 2-year period spanning pre-and post-diversion periods in order to assess the impact of the channel reconfiguration scheme on the fluvial suspended sediment dynamics. Analysis of the river response demonstrates that the fluvial sediment system has become more restrictive with reduced fine sediment transfer. This is characterized by reductions in flow-weighted mean suspended sediment concentrations from 77.93 mg L-1 prior to mitigation, to 74.36 mg L-1 following the diversion. A Mann-Whitney U test found statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the pre-and post-monitoring median suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs). Whilst application of one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on the coefficients of sediment rating curves developed before and after the diversion found statistically significant differences (p < 0.001), with both Loga and b coefficients becoming smaller following the diversion. Non-parametric analysis indicates a reduction in residuals through time (p < 0.001), with the developed LOWESS model over-predicting sediment concentrations as the channel stabilizes. However, the channel is continuing to adjust to the reconfigured morphology, with evidence of a headward propagating knickpoint which has migrated 120m at an exponentially decreasing rate over the last 7 years since diversion. The study demonstrates that channel reconfiguration can be effective in mitigating fine sediment flux in headwater streams but the full value of this may take many years to achieve whilst the fluvial system slowly readjusts.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Maps illustrating (a) Glaisdale catchment and associated land units. Contours are displayed at 10 m intervals. The box identifies the reach of Glaisdale Beck experiencing extensive landslide inputs, which was subsequently diverted. This is shown in detail in (b). The location of Glaisdale Beck in the regional and national context is provided in (c) and (d) respectively. © Crown Copyright/database right 2015. An Ordnance Survey/EDINA supplied service.
  • Figure 2. View looking upstream at a steep, 3 m high, near vertical bank of unconsolidated sediment exposed along Glaisdale Beck. This is at the distal end of a large hillslope failure complex.
  • Figure 3. Map showing the diversion location with control measures and monitoring site.
  • Figure 5. Relationship between normalized discharge and suspended sediment concentrations (a) before and (b) following the diversion of Glaisdale Beck. The red line represents all the available data for the time period. The broken black line represents the threshold models for normalized discharge within the range of greater than and less than 4.6 m3 s−1.
  • Figure 4. View looking downstream of the channel diversion during the construction phase. Photograph taken on day of diversion works; 10 October 2007.
  • Table 2. Summary of the developed empirical models for the prediction of suspended sediment concentrations from normalized discharge. Tv is the normalized discharge threshold value for model partition, set at 4.6 m s−1.
  • Figure 6. (a) Suspended sediment concentrations and (b) residuals over the entire monitoring period as a result of (c) the LOWESS model developed between normalized discharge and suspended sediment concentrations.
  • Table 3. Results of t tests on model parameters for the relationship between Log normalized Q and Log SSC, before and after channel diversion.

References Powered by Scopus

Global consequences of land use

9988Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots

8394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices

5853Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Can the Grain-for-Green Program Really Ensure a Low Sediment Load on the Chinese Loess Plateau?

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of spatially distributed time-integrated sediment sampling networks and distributed fine sediment modelling to inform catchment management

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas Perks, M., & Warburton, J. (2016). Reduced fine sediment flux and channel change in response to the managed diversion of an upland river channel. Earth Surface Dynamics, 4(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-705-2016

Readers over time

‘16‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

70%

Engineering 2

20%

Sports and Recreations 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0