Entomogastronomy, a step beyond just eating insects

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Entomophagy, or the consumption of insects as food by humans, developed thousands of years ago in some entomophagous cultures around the world, particularly in Africa, Asia and, especially, in South/Mesoamerica. Recently, FAO recommended edible insects as a good protein source for the future as an alternative to conventional meat, capable of contributing positively to the environment and human health. However, insect consumption still encounters significant cultural constraints (i.e. entomophobia) in Western societies. Among the various strategies to overcome entomophobia is the inclusion of edible insects in the tasting menus of some avant-garde restaurants run by renowned chefs around the world, with the idea that it will eventually spread to other casual and mid-range restaurants and also to home cooking. The chapter mainly addresses the treatment of edible insects in haute cuisine and creative cooking, highlighting the organoleptic aspects of insects and culinary transformations aimed at achieving deliciousness and palatability, not just edibility. The paradigmatic case of the gastronomic research on insect cuisine carried out by the Nordic Food Laboratory, a research offshoot of the world-famous Danish three-Michelin starred restaurant Noma, is presented.

References Powered by Scopus

887Citations
743Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

364Citations
603Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pérez-Lloréns, J. L. (2023). Entomogastronomy, a step beyond just eating insects. In Insects as Food and Food Ingredients: Technological Improvements, Sustainability, and Safety Aspects (pp. 191–214). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95594-2.00005-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free