Collective participation of children and young people in child welfare services–opportunities and challenges

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores opportunities and challenges for the participation of children and young people in Norwegian Child Welfare Services (CWS) through analysis from an action research project. The project aimed at collective participation in developing and improving child welfare services in a research circle in cooperation between young people, social workers from CWS and researchers. The researchers intended to involve the young people directly in the project, but the social workers opposed this. The project, therefore, proceeded with social workers and researchers in the research circle and parallel interviews and group conferences with young people with experience from CWS. The young people reported that they would have participated in the research circle if invited. This dichotomy between the social workers and the young people's opinions is the background for discussing opportunities and challenges for children and young people's collective participation in CWS. We conclude that a view of CYP and professional role characterised by protectionism and paternalism, together with a lack of knowledge and experience, hinder the collective participation of children and young people. We recommend that Child welfare services explore and develop working methods for collective participation in cooperation with children and young people.

References Powered by Scopus

A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

10908Citations
7457Readers
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tunestveit, M., Njøs, B. M., & Seim, S. (2023). Collective participation of children and young people in child welfare services–opportunities and challenges. European Journal of Social Work, 26(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2092073

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 182

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0