Refinement of experimental design and conduct in laboratory animal research

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
159Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The scientific literature of laboratory animal research is replete with papers reporting poor reproducibility of results as well as failure to translate results to clinical trials in humans. This may stem in part from poor experimental design and conduct of animal experiments. Despite widespread recognition of these problems and implementation of guidelines to attenuate them, a review of the literature suggests that experimental design and conduct of laboratory animal research are still in need of refinement. This paper will review and discuss possible sources of biases, highlight advantages and limitations of strategies proposed to alleviate them, and provide a conceptual framework for improving the reproducibility of laboratory animal research.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailoo, J. D., Reichlin, T. S., & Würbel, H. (2014). Refinement of experimental design and conduct in laboratory animal research. ILAR Journal, 55(3), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilu037

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 64

65%

Researcher 21

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35

54%

Medicine and Dentistry 11

17%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 10

15%

Neuroscience 9

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0