Morphometric relationship, phylogenetic correlation, and character evolution in the species-rich genus Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

32Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The species-rich genus Aphis consists of more than 500 species, many of them host-specific on a wide range of plants, yet very similar in general appearance due to convergence toward particular morphological types. Most species have been historically clustered into four main phenotypic groups (gossypii, craccivora, fabae, and spiraecola groups). To confirm the morphological hypotheses between these groups and to examine the characteristics that determine them, multivariate morphometric analyses were performed using 28 characters measured/counted from 40 species. To infer whether the morphological relationships are correlated with the genetic relationships, we compared the morphometric dataset with a phylogeny reconstructed from the combined dataset of three mtDNA and one nuclear DNA regions. Principal Findings: Based on a comparison of morphological and molecular datasets, we confirmed morphological reduction or regression in the gossypii group unlike in related groups. Most morphological characteristics of the gossypii group were less variable than for the other groups. Due to these, the gossypii group could be morphologically well separated from the craccivora, fabae, and spiraecola groups. In addition, the correlation of the rates of evolution between morphological and DNA datasets was highly significant in their diversification. Conclusions: The morphological separation between the gossypii group and the other species-groups are congruent with their phylogenetic relationships. Analysis of trait evolution revealed that the morphological traits found to be significant based on the morphometric analyses were confidently correlated with the phylogeny. The dominant patterns of trait evolution resulting in increased rates of short branches and temporally later evolution are likely suitable for the modality of Aphis speciation because they have adapted species-specifically, rapidly, and more recently on many different host plants. © 2010 Kim et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from ML analysis based on the GTR + I + c model using the combined sequences of COII (702 bp), 16S (1601 bp), CytB (737 bp), and EF1-a (802 bp). Posterior probabilities of BI analysis followed by ML bootstrap values in parentheses are given on or beneath nodes if greater than 50%. Letters enclosed in circles indicates two group partitions: gossypii group as ‘clade G’ and other three groups as ‘clade F’. Arrow means a short divergence point. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011608.g001
  • Table 1. The first two principal components that contributed to the separation of the 40 species or the 247 samples for 14 species in three PCAs.
  • Figure 2. Plot of the mean scores on the first two principle components for 40 species of Aphis and two related genera based on 28 morphological characters. Symbols are assigned according to the preordained three groups in the text: gossypii group (red open diamond), craccivora + fabae + spiraecola groups (blue closed circle), and unclassified species (gray closed triangle). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011608.g002
  • Figure 3. Plot of the mean scores on the first two principle components for 247 samples of 14 species representing the gossypii group (red-type symbols) and the craccivora + fabae + spiraecola groups (blue- and purple-type symbols) based on 25 characters. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011608.g003
  • Table 2. The first two canonical variables (total-sample standardized) that contributed to the separation of the 247 samples for 14 species in two CDAs.
  • Table 3. Statistical values by ANOVA tests for gossypii group versus all other species.
  • Figure 4. Comparison of branch lengths between the trees of combined DNA and three morphological datasets optimized with the topological constraint based on the ML tree (Figure 1). Arrow means a short divergence point in the gossypii group. Green background - gossypii group (typical morphology from A. glycines), yellow - craccivora + fabae + spiraecola groups (typical morphology from A. craccae), red - unclassified species. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011608.g004
  • Table 4. Correlation of patristic distance matrices by Pearson correlation coefficient, Mantel test, and K-tree score between the molecular dataset and the different morphological dataset assessed under the ML tree topology.

References Powered by Scopus

MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models

27246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models

14142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution

3912Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Whole genome sequence of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Macroevolutionary patterns in the Aphidini aphids (hemiptera: Aphididae): Diversification, host association, and biogeographic origins

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DNA barcoding and the associated PhylAphidB@se website for the identification of European aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., Lee, W., & Lee, S. (2010). Morphometric relationship, phylogenetic correlation, and character evolution in the species-rich genus Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae). PLoS ONE, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011608

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

63%

Researcher 19

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60

87%

Environmental Science 4

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

4%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0