Validation of a moral distress instrument in nurses of primary health care

13Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to validate an instrument to identify situations that trigger moral distress in relation to intensity and frequency in primary health care nurses. Method: this is a methodological study carried out with 391 nurses of primary health care, applied to the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses with 57 questions. Validation for primary health care was performed through expert committee evaluation, pre-test, factorial analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: there were 46 questions validated divided into six constructs: Health Policies, Working Conditions, Nurse Autonomy, Professional ethics, Disrespect to patient autonomy and Work Overload. The instrument had satisfactory internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha 0.98 for the instrument, and between 0.96 and 0.88 for the constructs. Conclusion: the instrument is valid and reliable to be used in the identification of the factors that trigger moral distress in primary care nurses, providing subsidies for new research in this field of professional practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate

570Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale

526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nurse moral distress: A proposed theory and research agenda

507Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Instruments to assess moral distress among healthcare workers: A systematic review of measurement properties

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethical problems and moral distress in primary care: A scoping review

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barth, P. O., Ramos, F. R. S., Barlem, E. L. D., Dalmolin, G. de L., & Schneider, D. G. (2018). Validation of a moral distress instrument in nurses of primary health care. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2227.3010

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

9%

Researcher 4

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 29

63%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

26%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free