Transformações na cientificidade e o ajuste inferencial na Ciência Política: Argumento e evidências na produção de alto fator de impacto

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper analyses transformations in the scientific status of Political Science in the two last decades. The analysis provides evidence corroborating the hypothesis about the high impact production has been adjusting to the rules of inference. This adjustment brings about a characteristic condition called Inferential Pluralism in which coexist multiple logics of causation to produce valid inferences. Empirically, the paper develops an original methodology, based in text analysis and mining data analysis, to measure Inferential Pluralism and test the argument in a population of 2331 articles published in five high impact journals in period 2005-2015.

References Powered by Scopus

Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts

1951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is a case study and what is it good for?

1689Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research

1538Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nurse researchers and nursing assistants: construction and projection of polymorphous identities

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UNNECESSARY DIVISION BETWEEN A QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO LEGAL RESEARCH: RETHINKING THE ADVANTAGES OF METHODOLOGICAL PLURALISM TO CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW RESEARCH

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contemporary Contributions of Qualitative Methodologies to Policy Analysis: Process Tracing y Qualitative Comparative Analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rezende, F. da C. (2017). Transformações na cientificidade e o ajuste inferencial na Ciência Política: Argumento e evidências na produção de alto fator de impacto. Revista de Sociologia e Politica, 25(63), 103–138. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987317256305

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

82%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

9%

Psychology 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0