Measures of interrater agreement

157Citations
Citations of this article
292Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Kappa statistics is used for the assessment of agreement between two or more raters when the measurement scale is categorical. In this short summary, we discuss and interpret the key features of the kappa statistics, the impact of prevalence on the kappa statistics, and its utility in clinical research. We also introduce the weighted kappa when the outcome is ordinal and the intraclass correlation to assess agreement in an event the data are measured on a continuous scale. Copyright © 2010 by the international Association fot the Study of lung Cancer.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

31703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability

2756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reliability and concurrent validity of global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): A systematic review

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pulmonary high-resolution ultrashort TE MR imaging: Comparison with thin-section standard- and low-dose computed tomography for the assessment of pulmonary parenchyma diseases

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandrekar, J. N. (2011). Measures of interrater agreement. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 6(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318200f983

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 129

64%

Researcher 37

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 23

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 14

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 82

66%

Psychology 20

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0