Molecular identification and environmental DNA detection of gill lice ectoparasites associated with Brook Trout declines

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Gill lice Salmincola spp. are among the most widely reported parasites of freshwater salmonids and have been associated with recent declines in native Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis populations. Effective gill lice surveillance is vital for salmonid conservation success, but current survey approaches are often inadequate or problematic. We developed an environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approach to detect the gill louse Salmincola edwardsii and explored the viability of this approach as a management tool for rapid, large-scale gill lice surveillance at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, USA. Methods: Reference sequences were generated from gill lice specimens collected at Fort McCoy to confirm their identify as S. edwardsii and used to design a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay that targets S. edwardsii mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI). Assay validation included in silico and in vitro sensitivity and nontarget specificity testing, and assay performance was validated in situ by sampling eDNA at sites characterized via electrofishing. Result: Molecular analysis of reference sequences confirmed S. edwardsii identity while also providing the first multi-population assessment of genetic variation for North American Salmincola and the most taxonomically comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Lernaeopodidae to date. Salmincola edwardsii eDNA was detected at 14 of 38 sites, including 12 of 14 sites with known active infestations, with no evidence that the odds of detecting gill lice via electrofishing was greater than the odds of detections from eDNA analysis. Brook Trout presence was highly predictive of gill lice eDNA site occupancy, concordant with S. edwardsii being an obligate parasite of Salvelinus fishes. However, by expanding survey coverage via eDNA analysis, we were able to identify an isolated drainage with Brook Trout where S. edwardsii is apparently absent, confirming electrofishing observations. Conclusion: These results suggest that eDNA analysis is equivalent to electrofishing for detecting gill lice in terms of performance yet offers substantial gains in survey efficiency. Further, this study demonstrates how eDNA analysis can provide valuable intel for directing management efforts, especially when used to expand survey coverage and prioritize follow-up conventional surveys to assess host–parasite abundance, demographics, and status.

References Powered by Scopus

MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability

31040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11

11081Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7

7368Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasite

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fish ectoparasite detection, collection and curation

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, A. D., Tetzlaff, S. J., Johnson, M. D., Noble, J. D., Rood, S., Maki, D., & Sperry, J. H. (2023). Molecular identification and environmental DNA detection of gill lice ectoparasites associated with Brook Trout declines. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 152(6), 788–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10439

Readers over time

‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 2

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0