Heuristic use or information integration in the estimation of subjective likelihood?

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Use of the representativeness heuristic [described by Kahneman & Tversky (1972)] in estimating subjective likelihoods was investigated in three experiments. Procedural factors (number of problems per subject, information available to subjects) were found to account for differences in data from the two-urn situation collected by Kahneman and Tversky (1972) and Leon and Anderson (1974). Subjects use the representativeness heuristic in such problems but seem to modify it by using other sources of information when these are available or demanded by the situation. © 1975, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness

2793Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A ratio rule from integration theory applied to inference judgments

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ward, L. M. (1975). Heuristic use or information integration in the estimation of subjective likelihood? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333139

Readers over time

‘12‘14‘17‘18‘20‘2100.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

86%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0