From PhotoWork to PhotoUse: exploring personal digital photo activities

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People accumulate large collections of digital photos, which they use for individual, social, and utilitarian purposes. In order to provide suitable technologies for enjoying our expanding photo collections, it is essential to understand how and to what purpose these collections are used. Contextual interviews with 12 participants in their homes explored the use of digital photos, incorporating new photo activities that are offered by new technologies. Based on the qualitative analysis of the collected data, we give an overview of current photo activities, which we term PhotoUse. We introduce a model of PhotoUse, which emphasises the purpose of photo activities rather than the tools to support them. We argue for the use of our model to design tools to support the user’s individual and social goals pertaining to PhotoUse.

References Powered by Scopus

The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system

3185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation

2825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Chronoscope: Designing temporally diverse interactions with personal digital photo collections

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Externalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hunters and Gatherers of Pictures: Why Photography Has Become a Human Universal

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broekhuijsen, M., van den Hoven, E., & Markopoulos, P. (2017). From PhotoWork to PhotoUse: exploring personal digital photo activities. Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(7), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1288266

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

22%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

38%

Design 5

31%

Social Sciences 4

25%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free