Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention

23Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Accumulating evidence suggests that the built environment is associated with physical activity. The extent to which the built environment may support adherence to physical activity interventions is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the neighbourhood built environment constrains or facilitates adherence and steps taken during a 12-week internet-delivered pedometer-based physical activity intervention (UWALK). Method The study was undertaken in Calgary (Canada) between May 2016 and August 2017. Inactive adults (n = 573) completed a telephone survey measuring sociodemographic characteristics and perceived neighbourhood walkability. Following the survey, participants were mailed a pedometer and instructions for joining UWALK. Participants were asked to report their daily pedometer steps into the online program on a weekly basis for 12 weeks (84 days). Walk Score® estimated objective neighbourhood walkability and the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale–Abbreviated (NEWS-A) measured participants self-reported neighbourhood walkability. Regression models estimated covariate-adjusted associations of objective and self-reported walkability with: 1) adherence to the UWALK intervention (count of days with steps reported and count of days with 10000 steps reported), and; 2) average daily pedometer steps. Results On average, participants undertook 8565 (SD = 3030) steps per day, reported steps on 67 (SD = 22.3) of the 84 days, and achieved =10000 steps on 22 (SD = 20.5) of the 84 days. Adjusting for covariates, a one-unit increase in self-reported walkability was associated on average with 45.76 (95CI 14.91, 76.61) more daily pedometer steps. Walk Score® was not significantly associated with steps. Neither objective nor self-reported walkability were significantly associated with the UWALK adherence outcomes. Conclusion The neighbourhood built environment may support pedometer-measured physical activity but may not influence adherence to pedometer interventions. Perceived walkability may be more important than objectively-measured walkability in supporting physical activity during pedometer interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

8715Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects

4019Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review

1739Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relationship between walk score® and perceived walkability in ultrahigh density areas

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors influencing subjective walkability: Results from built environment audit data

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Consoli, A., Nettel-Aguirre, A., Spence, J. C., McHugh, T. L., Mummery, K., & McCormack, G. R. (2020). Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242999

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

18%

Researcher 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

35%

Design 4

24%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0