La construcción de lo indecible: Chisme, dato y etnografía en un contexto policial Argentino

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some time ago, Gluckman stated that a most important part of gaining membership to a group is to learn its scandals: what you can say and what you may not. So, what happens during fieldwork when the anthropologist bumps into a piece of information that is considered gossip but it can also be considered data? When and why we reach the limit of what can be said? This paper addresses an episode that took place during my fieldwork in an Argentinean police school, with the aim of reflecting on the anthropological practice and its production of knowledge, and of undressing the tensions between what the ethnographer knows, what he is let to know and what it finally reaches the ethnographical text.

References Powered by Scopus

Narrating the self

823Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

“In Cold Blood”: Hierarchies of Credibility and the Politics of Colonial Narratives

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On secrecy, disclosure, the public, and the private in anthropology

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Catching the White Fish: gossip and cocaine on Colombia's Northern Pacific coast

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A woman anthropologist in the police: a reflection about gender and power relations in the field

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Local networks and judicial bureaucracies: Ethnographic analysis of a trial against humanity in a City in Northeastern Argentina

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sirimarco, M. (2017). La construcción de lo indecible: Chisme, dato y etnografía en un contexto policial Argentino. Revista de Antropologia Social, 26(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.5209/RASO.56042

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

80%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 24

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0