An approach to mode and anomaly detection with spacecraft telemetry data

17Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper discusses a mixed method that combines unsupervised learning methods and human expert input for analyzing telemetry data from long-duration robotic space mis-sions. Our goal is to develop more automated methods for detecting anomalies in time series data. Once anomalies are identified using unsupervised learning methods we use fea-ture selection methods followed by expert input to derive the knowledge required for building on-line detectors. These detectors can be used in later phases of the current mission and in future missions for improving operations and overall safety of the mission. Whereas the primary focus in this paper is on developing data-driven anomaly detection methods, we also present a computational platform for data mining and analytics that can operate on historical data offline, as well as incoming telemetry data on-line.

References Powered by Scopus

Anomaly detection: A survey

8886Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Dendrite Method Foe Cluster Analysis

5756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set

2870Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Imbalanced satellite telemetry data anomaly detection model based on Bayesian LSTM

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intelligent health monitoring systems for space missions based on data mining techniques

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structural Fault Detection and Isolation in Hybrid Systems

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biswas, G., Khorasgani, H., Stanje, G., Dubey, A., Deb, S., & Ghoshal, S. (2016). An approach to mode and anomaly detection with spacecraft telemetry data. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2016.v7i4.2467

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Researcher 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 15

65%

Computer Science 5

22%

Mathematics 2

9%

Materials Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0