Environmental impacts of future bioenergy pathways: The case of electricity from wheat straw bales and pellets

49Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study presents the life cycle assessment of electricity generation from straw bales and pellets. Straw is the most abundant biomass residue in Europe and its use for energy purposes is promoted on the premise of high greenhouse gas savings. This assumption has delayed the study of sustainability of straw-fired systems on a broader sense and the literature on the topic is almost absent. This study uses data from specific literature and emissions inventories to model a number of straw pathways. The plant modeled is a medium-scale straw-fired power plant of 50 MWth capacity. The results show that electricity from straw-fired power plants can indeed realize high greenhouse gas savings compared both with existing coal plants and with the European electricity mix. The savings are in the range 70-94%. The influence of the geographical origin of straw is analyzed by using datasets for the cultivation of wheat in five different European countries. The highest emissions are recorded for the case of straw from Spain due to the small yields, whereas cultivation processes in United Kingdom and the Netherlands show high environmental impacts due to the high level of fertilization. Other environmental impacts are evaluated, such as acidification potential, eutrophication, particulate matter emissions, and photochemical ozone formation. The bioenergy system scores worse than the current European electricity mix for all the categories. However, it is important to notice that in Spain and United Kingdom the straw system shows lower impacts compared with the local average coal electricity. Finally, the study investigates the 'break-even' distance at which the higher emissions from the pellets production are paid off by the saved emissions in their transport compared with the bales. The results show that no reasonable break-even distance exists for road transport, whereas advantages for pellets are evident in any configuration for transoceanic transport. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

An overview of the chemical composition of biomass

1940Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology

1650Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Combustion of agricultural residues

1001Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Biomass for thermochemical conversion: Targets and challenges

225Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change impacts of power generation from residual biomass

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Domestic heating from forest logging residues: Environmental risks and benefits

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giuntoli, J., Boulamanti, A. K., Corrado, S., Motegh, M., Agostini, A., & Baxter, D. (2013). Environmental impacts of future bioenergy pathways: The case of electricity from wheat straw bales and pellets. GCB Bioenergy, 5(5), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12012

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

66%

Researcher 20

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 24

44%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16

29%

Energy 9

16%

Chemical Engineering 6

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0