Self-concept and ego development in deaf adolescents: A comparative study

41Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Self-concept and ego development, two intertwined aspects of self-indicating well-being and social-cognitive maturation, respectively, were examined in a representative sample of deaf adolescents of normal intelligence (N = 68), using translated and adapted versions of Harter's (1988, Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver) multidimensional measure of self-concept and Loevinger's (1998, Technical foundations for measuring ego development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) measure of ego development. Compared to hearing norm groups, deaf adolescents showed lower levels of self-perceived social acceptance, close friendships and ego development and higher physical appearance. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses controlling for sociodemographic variables showed positive associations of global self-worth with support for signing during childhood and quality of parent-child communication and of ego development with attending a regular school. Cluster analysis identified three social competence profiles: uniformly low competence, uniformly high competence, and low social acceptance with high physical appearance. Cluster membership was associated with school type, ego development, and (past) neurological disorder. The results are discussed in reference to interventions aimed at the well-being of deaf youth. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van gent, T., Goedhart, A. W., Knoors, H. E. T., Westenberg, P. M., & Treffers, P. D. A. (2012). Self-concept and ego development in deaf adolescents: A comparative study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 63

75%

Researcher 11

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 38

45%

Social Sciences 23

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free