Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data

3.2kCitations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We describe a statistical approach for identifying nonlinearity in time series. The method first specifies some linear process as a null hypothesis, then generates surrogate data sets which are consistent with this null hypothesis, and finally computes a discriminating statistic for the original and for each of the surrogate data sets. If the value computed for the original data is significantly different than the ensemble of values computed for the surrogate data, then the null hypothesis is rejected and nonlinearity is detected. We discuss various null hypotheses and discriminating statistics. The method is demonstrated for numerical data generated by known chaotic systems, and applied to a number of experimental time series which arise in the measurement of superfluids, brain waves, and sunspots; we evaluate the statistical significance of the evidence for nonlinear structure in each case, and illustrate aspects of the data which this approach identifies. © 1992.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors

4989Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterization of strange attractors

4259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors

4078Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems

3023Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals

2941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart rate variability: A review

2144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., & Doyne Farmer, J. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 58(1–4), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 495

63%

Researcher 192

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 78

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 25

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 222

45%

Physics and Astronomy 109

22%

Computer Science 82

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free