World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties

2.7kCitations
Citations of this article
2.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper reports on the field testing, empirical derivation and psychometric properties of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life assessment (the WHOQOL). The steps are presented from the development of the initial pilot version of the instrument to the field trial version, the so-called WHOQOL-100. The instrument has been developed collaboratively in a number of centres in diverse cultural settings over several years; data are presented on the performance of the instrument in 15 different settings worldwide.

References Powered by Scopus

The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization

0
4729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A Review and Comparison of Strategies

876Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of Life Measurements in Patients with Malignant Disease: A Review

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment

5542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring Health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires

3877Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial a Report from the WHOQOL Group

3280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Power, M., & Kuyken, W. (1998). World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 817

68%

Researcher 200

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 107

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 74

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 542

47%

Psychology 303

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 188

16%

Social Sciences 120

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free