Integrating Dialectical and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organizations

228Citations
Citations of this article
473Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a typology and process model that integrate dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Whereas paradox research depicts tensions between contradictory elements as irreconcilable and best managed through acceptance and synergy, the dialectical perspective portrays the relationship of such elements as adversarial and transformed through conflict. Our integrated typology and process model account for both dialectical and paradox approaches to managing contradictions and also identify two approaches, assimilation and adjustment, which combine the two. The model also identifies a key contingency, the expected distribution of power between contradictory elements, as a key influence on actors’ approaches to managing contradictions. For paradox researchers our integrated model emphasizes the need for more attention to the political, institutional, and social contexts of contradictions, practices for managing conflict, and transformation of organizational contradictions. Our integrated model suggests that dialectics researchers pay attention to the strategies managers use to productively manage tensions between contradictory elements, take a contingent view of transformation, and recognize that acceptance of contradiction may play a role in transformation. Hence our integrated model suggests a broadened agenda for both paradox and dialectics researchers.

References Powered by Scopus

Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment

6576Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing

2758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations

1980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity*

443Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generating theory by abduction

333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Makes a Process Theoretical Contribution?

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2017). Integrating Dialectical and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organizations. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640843

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 235

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 48

14%

Researcher 31

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 26

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 224

72%

Social Sciences 61

20%

Psychology 15

5%

Computer Science 10

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free