Centrality of buddhist religiosity scale: Adaptation and validation of the centrality of religiosity scale in a buddhist sample in Vietnam

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes an adaptation of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale to the Buddhist religious tradition (CBRS) and a validation in Vietnam. The sample included data from 421 Viet-namese Buddhists (300 females, 121 males), aged 17 to 71 years (M = 35.03, SD = 13.09). The results provided evidence for good psychometric properties of the short, intermediate, and long version: CBRS-5, CBRS-10, and CBRS-15 respectively. Specifically, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the measure’s original five-factor structure: intellect, ideology, public practice, private practice, and religious experience. Furthermore, the Centrality of Buddhist Religiosity has proven to be a stable psychological construct across the three versions of CBRS and was associated strongly with the Gordon Allport’s notion of the intrinsic religious orientation. The results also suggested that the Stefan Huber’s centrality of religiosity model can capture the Buddhist religiosity and that the CBRS can be used to measure the five theoretical defined core dimensions of religiosity in Buddhism.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

79517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)

503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The religiosity of women in the modern West

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the shortest version of the Central Religiosity Scale (CRS-5) in a sample of young adults

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale for the Portuguese Population

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Buddhism and its Contribution to Positive Psychology

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, H. T. M., Ackert, M., Flückiger, C., & Scheiblich, H. (2021). Centrality of buddhist religiosity scale: Adaptation and validation of the centrality of religiosity scale in a buddhist sample in Vietnam. Religions, 12(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020079

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

55%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Arts and Humanities 1

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0