Compliance and individual sanctions in the enforcement of competition law

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter describes the status quo of criminal enforcement in selected Member States of the European Union and discusses the desirability of criminal enforcement of competition law from a policy perspective. It concludes that at least in Germany the introduction of a criminal offence for horizontal hardcore cartels beyond the existing bid-rigging offence would be desirable, provided an automatic criminal immunity provision for immunity recipients under a leniency programme within the European Competition Network is introduced and the Bundeskartellamt is involved in the criminal prosecution. The introduction of effective criminal enforcement would make compliance training both more important and more effective. Criminalisation makes compliance more important because compliance training helps to spread knowledge about the criminal offence-and only a known threat can deter. Criminalisation makes compliance training more effective because the participants of compliance sessions are motivated to pay attention to avoid criminal liability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner-Von Papp, F. (2016). Compliance and individual sanctions in the enforcement of competition law. In Competition Law Compliance Programmes: An Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 135–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44633-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free