Defect modeling and control in structurally and compositionally complex materials

13Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventional computational approaches for modeling defects face difficulties when applied to complex materials, mainly due to the vast configurational space of defects. In this Perspective, we discuss the challenges in calculating defect properties in complex materials, review recent advances in computational techniques and showcase new mechanistic insights developed from these methods. We further discuss the remaining challenges in improving the accuracy and efficiency of defect modeling in complex materials, and provide an outlook on potential research directions.

References Powered by Scopus

Climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths

16905Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes

11640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys

7377Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Imperfections are not 0 K: free energy of point defects in crystals

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Imaging of atomic stress at grain boundaries based on machine learning

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical Role of Configurational Disorder in Stabilizing Chemically Unfavorable Coordination in Complex Compounds

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Kang, J., & Wei, S. H. (2023). Defect modeling and control in structurally and compositionally complex materials. Nature Computational Science, 3(3), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00403-8

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 16

73%

Physics and Astronomy 3

14%

Engineering 2

9%

Energy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0