In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Errors throughout gene expression are likely deleterious, hence genomes are under selection to ameliorate their consequences. Additional stop codons (ASCs) are in-frame nonsense ‘codons’ downstream of the primary stop which may be read by translational machinery should the primary stop have been accidentally read through. Prior evidence in several eukaryotes suggests that ASCs are selected to prevent potentially-deleterious consequences of read-through. We extend this evidence showing that enrichment of ASCs is common but not universal for single cell eukaryotes. By contrast, there is limited evidence as to whether the same is true in other taxa. Here, we provide the first systematic test of the hypothesis that ASCs act as a fail-safe mechanism in eubacteria, a group with high readthrough rates. Contra to the predictions of the hypothesis we find: there is paucity, not enrichment, of ASCs downstream; substitutions that degrade stops are more frequent in-frame than out-of-frame in 3’ sequence; highly expressed genes are no more likely to have ASCs than lowly expressed genes; usage of the leakiest primary stop (TGA) in highly expressed genes does not predict ASC enrichment even compared to usage of non-leaky stops (TAA) in lowly expressed genes, beyond downstream codon +1. Any effect at the codon immediately proximal to the primary stop can be accounted for by a preference for a T/U residue immediately following the stop, although if anything, TT- and TC- starting codons are preferred. We conclude that there is no compelling evidence for ASC selection in eubacteria. This presents an unusual case in which the same error could be solved by the same mechanism in eukaryotes and prokaryotes but is not. We discuss two possible explanations: that, owing to the absence of nonsense mediated decay, bacteria may solve readthrough via gene truncation and in eukaryotes certain prion states cause raised readthrough rates.

References Powered by Scopus

NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline

5106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity

579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Version 4.0 of PaxDb: Protein abundance data, integrated across model organisms, tissues, and cell-lines

391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Genetically engineered bacteria: a new frontier in targeted drug delivery

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Readthrough errors purge deleterious cryptic sequences, facilitating the birth of coding sequences

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unusual mammalian usage of TGA stop codons reveals that sequence conservation need not imply purifying selection

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ho, A. T., & Hurst, L. D. (2019). In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons. PLoS Genetics, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008386

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

86%

Chemistry 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0