How Often Can Earthquake Early Warning Systems Alert Sites With High-Intensity Ground Motion?

42Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although numerous Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) algorithms have been developed to date, we lack a detailed understanding of how often and under what circumstances useful ground motion alerts can be provided to end users. In particular, it is unclear how often EEW systems can successfully alert sites with high ground motion intensities. These are the sites that arguably need EEW alerts the most, but they are also the most challenging ones to alert because they tend to be located close to the epicenter where the seismic waves arrive first. Here we analyze the alerting performance of the Propagation of Local Undamped Motion (PLUM), Earthquake Point-Source Integrated Code (EPIC), and Finite-Fault Rupture Detector (FinDer) algorithms by running them retrospectively on the seismic strong-motion data of the 219 earthquakes in Japan since 1996 that exceeded Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) of 4.5 on at least 10 sites (Mw 4.5–9.1). Our analysis suggests that, irrespective of the algorithm, EEW end users should expect that EEW can often but not always provide useful alerts. Using a conservative warning time (tw) definition, we find that 40–60% of sites with strong to extreme shaking levels receive alerts with tw > 5 s. If high-intensity shaking is caused by shallow crustal events, around 50% of sites with strong (MMI~6) and <20% of sites with severe and violent (MMI ≥ 8) shaking receive alerts with tw > 5 s. Our results provide detailed quantitative insight into the expected alerting performance for EEW algorithms under realistic conditions. We also discuss how operational systems can achieve longer warning times with more precautionary alerting strategies.

References Powered by Scopus

Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan - Hi-net, F-net, K-net and KiK-net -

715Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified mercalli intensity in California

322Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outline of the 2011 off the pacific coast of tohoku earthquake (M <inf>w</inf> 9.0) -earthquake early warning and observed seismic intensity

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Shakealert earthquake early warning system performance during the 2019 ridgecrest earthquake sequence

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The transformer earthquake alerting model: A new versatile approach to earthquake early warning

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Big Data Seismology

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meier, M. A., Kodera, Y., Böse, M., Chung, A., Hoshiba, M., Cochran, E., … Heaton, T. (2020). How Often Can Earthquake Early Warning Systems Alert Sites With High-Intensity Ground Motion? Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017718

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

64%

Researcher 5

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 13

57%

Engineering 5

22%

Computer Science 3

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free