Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores: Review

328Citations
Citations of this article
773Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Selective harvesting regimes are often implemented because age and sex classes contribute differently to population dynamics and hunters show preferences associated with body size and trophy value. We reviewed the literature on how such cropping regimes affect the demography of the remaining population (here termed demographic side effects). First, we examined the implications of removing a large proportion of a specific age or sex class. Such harvesting strategies often bias the population sex ratio toward females and reduce the mean age of males, which may consequently delay birth dates, reduce birth synchrony, delay body mass development, and alter offspring sex ratios. Second, we reviewed the side effects associated with the selective removal of relatively few specific individuals, often large trophy males. Such selective harvesting can destabilize social structures and the dominance hierarchy and may cause loss of social knowledge, sexually selected infanticide, habitat changes among reproductive females, and changes in offspring sex ratio. A common feature of many of the reported mechanisms is that they ultimately depress recruitment and in some extreme cases even cause total reproductive collapse. These effects could act additively and destabilize the dynamics of populations, thus having a stronger effect on population growth rate than first anticipated. Although more experimental than observational studies reported demographic side effects, we argue that this may reflect the quite subtle mechanisms involved, which are unlikely to be detected in observational studies without rigorous monitoring regimes. We call for more detailed studies of hunted populations with marked individuals that address how the expression of these effects varies across mating systems, habitats, and with population density. Theoretical models investigating how strongly these effects influence population growth rates are also required. © 2007 Society for Conservation Biology.

References Powered by Scopus

Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring

2792Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores

1336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Population dynamics of large herbivores: Variable recruitment with constant adult survival

1064Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patterns, Causes, and Consequences of Anthropocene Defaunation

392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: How much do we know?

348Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Illegal killing for ivory drives global decline in African elephants

289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milner, J. M., Nilsen, E. B., & Andreassen, H. P. (2007, February). Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores: Review. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00591.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 320

60%

Researcher 153

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 41

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 417

71%

Environmental Science 148

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

2%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 11

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
References: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free