Structural holes and good ideas

3.8kCitations
Citations of this article
4.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article outlines the mechanism by which brokerage provides social capital. Opinion and behavior are more homogeneous within than between groups, so people connected across groups are more familiar with alternative ways of thinking and behaving. Brokerage across the structural holes between groups provides a vision of options otherwise unseen, which is the mechanism by which brokerage becomes social capital. I review evidence consistent with the hypothesis, then look at the networks around managers in a large American electronics company. The organization is rife with structural holes, and brokerage has its expected correlates. Compensation, positive performance evaluations, promotions, and good ideas are disproportionately in the hands of people whose networks span structural holes. The between-group brokers are more likely to express ideas, less likely to have ideas dismissed, and more likely to have ideas evaluated as valuable. I close with implications for creativity and structural change.

References Powered by Scopus

Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage

11851Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology

7796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology

5710Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Affect and creativity at work

1469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation

1389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge

1239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2289

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 421

13%

Researcher 363

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 142

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 1266

45%

Social Sciences 1088

39%

Computer Science 261

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 189

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 3
News Mentions: 9
References: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free