How to define a good recruiter: a dual-process model of recruiter effect

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), this paper aims to investigate a complete dual process model of the recruiter effect and the initiated role of recruiters’ social skills. Recruiters’ informativeness and affective delivery are two processing cues used separately by applicants in central and peripheral processing mechanisms, and hypothesized as the mechanisms underlying the recruiter effect. Two studies using higher education institutions’ recruitment populations were conducted to test three hypotheses. Outcomes from different recruitment stages were used separately in the two studies – informative usability and applicants’ satisfaction from the early stage (Study 1) and pursuit intention from the later stage (Study 2). Multilevel modeling was used for both studies. The results support three hypotheses. Specifically, recruiters with strong social skills demonstrate greater informativeness and affect, shown as higher recruiters’ informativeness and affective delivery. Applicants thus perceive the information provided to be usable, are satisfied with recruiters (Study 1), and have increased intentions to pursue the applied-for job (Study 2). This paper focuses on recruiters’ informativeness as the central cue and tests the possibility of multi-channel processing, making it the first investigation about ELM in recruitment after multi-channel processing was proposed. By thoroughly testing and extending ELM, the paper highlights the dual process model underlying the recruiter effect and the role of recruiters’ social skills. The investigation elucidates the factors initiating the recruiter effect and the corresponding influencing mechanism. Practical implications for organizations are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation

3065Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

When "the show must go on": Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery

1541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption

1195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Positive affect congruence between recruiters and applicants: effects on mutual attitudes and behaviors

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How attachment affects platform revisit and repurchase intentions: a perspective from attachment theory

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

LMX and recruiter incivility toward job seekers: a self-serving attribution perspective

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qu, X., Yao, X., & Zhang, W. (2023). How to define a good recruiter: a dual-process model of recruiter effect. Current Psychology, 42(34), 30111–30124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04030-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 1

33%

Social Sciences 1

33%

Psychology 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free