A cohort study to identify and evaluate concussion risk factors across multiple injury settings: findings from the CARE Consortium

28Citations
Citations of this article
137Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Concussion, or mild traumatic brain injury, is a major public health concern affecting 42 million individuals globally each year. However, little is known regarding concussion risk factors across all concussion settings as most concussion research has focused on only sport-related or military-related concussive injuries. Methods: The current study is part of the Concussion, Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium, a multi-site investigation on the natural history of concussion. Cadets at three participating service academies completed annual baseline assessments, which included demographics, medical history, and concussion history, along with the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) symptom checklist and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18). Clinical and research staff recorded the date and injury setting at time of concussion. Generalized mixed models estimated concussion risk with service academy as a random effect. Since concussion was a rare event, the odds ratios were assumed to approximate relative risk. Results: Beginning in 2014, 10,604 (n = 2421, 22.83% female) cadets enrolled over 3 years. A total of 738 (6.96%) cadets experienced a concussion, 301 (2.84%) concussed cadets were female. Female sex and previous concussion were the most consistent estimators of concussion risk across all concussion settings. Compared to males, females had 2.02 (95% CI: 1.70–2.40) times the risk of a concussion regardless of injury setting, and greater relative risk when the concussion occurred during sport (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.38 95% CI: 1.07–1.78). Previous concussion was associated with 1.98 (95% CI: 1.65–2.37) times increased risk for any incident concussion, and the magnitude was relatively stable across all concussion settings (OR: 1.73 to 2.01). Freshman status was also associated with increased overall concussion risk, but was driven by increased risk for academy training-related concussions (OR: 8.17 95% CI: 5.87–11.37). Medical history of headaches in the past 3 months, diagnosed ADD/ADHD, and BSI-18 Somatization symptoms increased overall concussion risk. Conclusions: Various demographic and medical history factors are associated with increased concussion risk. While certain factors (e.g. sex and previous concussion) are consistently associated with increased concussion risk, regardless of concussion injury setting, other factors significantly influence concussion risk within specific injury settings. Further research is required to determine whether these risk factors may aid in concussion risk reduction or prevention.

References Powered by Scopus

The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

45071Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview

2966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq

2387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sideline concussion assessment: The current state of the art

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differences in Adolescent Symptom Reporting Following Motor Vehicle Accident Versus Sport-Related Concussion

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of Concussion Education Exposure on Concussion-Related Educational Targets and Self-Reported Concussion Disclosure among First-Year Service Academy Cadets

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Pelt, K. L., Allred, D., Cameron, K. L., Campbell, D. E., D’Lauro, C. J., He, X., … Broglio, S. P. (2019). A cohort study to identify and evaluate concussion risk factors across multiple injury settings: findings from the CARE Consortium. Injury Epidemiology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0178-3

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

62%

Researcher 15

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

40%

Psychology 13

22%

Sports and Recreations 12

20%

Neuroscience 11

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0