Transcranial sonographic assessment of the third ventricle in neuro-ICU patients to detect hydrocephalus: a diagnostic reliability pilot study

10Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Transcranial sonography is a point-of-care tool recommended in intensive care units (ICU) to monitor brain injured patients. Objectives of the study was to assess feasibility and reliability of the third ventricle (V3) diameter measurement using transcranial sonography (TCS) compared to brain computed-tomography (CT), the gold standard measurement, and to measure the TCS learning curve. Design: prospective study, in a 16-bed neurological ICU in an academic hospital. Every consecutive brain injured adult patient, who required a brain CT and TCS monitoring were included. The V3 diameter was blindly measured by TCS and CT. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot were used to assess the reliability and agreement between TCS and CT V3 measurements. Diagnosis performance of the V3 diameter using TCS to detect hydrocephalus was measured. Absolute difference between V3 measurement by residents and experts was measured consecutively to assess the learning curve. Results: Among the 100 patients included in the study, V3 diameter could be assessed in 87 patients (87%) from at least one side of the skull. Both temporal windows were available in 70 patients (70%). The ICC between V3 diameter measured by TCS and CT was 0.90 [95% CI 0.84–0.93] on the right side, and 0.92 [0.88–0.95] on the left side. In Bland–Altman analysis, mean difference, standard deviation, 95% limits of agreement were 0.36, 1.52, − 2.7 to 3.3 mm, respectively, on the right side; 0.25, 1.47, − 2.7 to 3.1 mm, respectively, on the left side. Among the 35 patients with hydrocephalus, V3 diameters could be measured by TCS in 31 patients (89%) from at least one side. Hydrocephalus was, respectively, excluded, confirmed, or inconclusive using TCS in 35 (40%), 25 (29%) and 27 (31%) of the 87 assessable patients. After 5 measurements, every resident reached a satisfactory measurement compared to the expert operator. Conclusion: TCS allows rapid, simple and reliable V3 diameter measurement compared with the gold standard in neuro-ICU patients. Aside from sparing irradiating procedures and transfers to the radiology department, it may especially increase close patient monitoring to detect clinically occult hydrocephalus earlier. Further studies are needed to measure the potential clinical benefit of this method. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02830269.

References Powered by Scopus

The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care

7703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring agreement in method comparison studies

7600Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) Based on a European/North American Multicenter Study

6213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pupillometry in the follow-up of patients undergoing EVT - prediction of space-occupying hemispheric infarction

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcranial sonographic measurement of the third ventricle to detect hydrocephalus in children population: Correlation to computed tomography

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability of Third Ventricle Assessment by Transcranial Ultrasound: A Computational Model of the Effect of Insonation Angle

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Widehem, R., Bory, P., Greco, F., Pavillard, F., Chalard, K., Mas, A., … Chanques, G. (2021). Transcranial sonographic assessment of the third ventricle in neuro-ICU patients to detect hydrocephalus: a diagnostic reliability pilot study. Annals of Intensive Care, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00857-x

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 2

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Physics and Astronomy 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0