The case for a Casimir cosmology: The case for a Casimir cosmology

20Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The cosmological constant, also known as dark energy, was believed to be caused by vacuum fluctuations, but naive calculations give results in stark disagreement with fact. In the Casimir effect, vacuum fluctuations cause forces in dielectric media, which is very well described by Lifshitz theory. Recently, using the analogy between geometries and media, a cosmological constant of the correct order of magnitude was calculated with Lifshitz theory (Leonhardt 2019 Ann. Phys. (New York) 411, 167973. (doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167973)). This paper discusses the empirical evidence and the ideas behind the Lifshitz theory of the cosmological constant without requiring prior knowledge of cosmology and quantum field theory. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The next generation of analogue gravity experiments'.

References Powered by Scopus

Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant

15599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift Supernovae

14806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters

7202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

In the realm of the Hubble tension - A review of solutions

1064Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The next generation of analogue gravity experiments: Introduction to the issue

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Casimir forces on deformed fermionic chains

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leonhardt, U. (2020). The case for a Casimir cosmology: The case for a Casimir cosmology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 378(2177). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0229

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

67%

Materials Science 3

33%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0