Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial

47Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare short-term application of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Working Hypothesis: nHFOV improves CO2 removal with respect to nCPAP in preterm infants needing noninvasive respiratory support and persistent oxygen supply after the first 72 h of life. Study Design: Multicenter non-blinded prospective randomized crossover study. Patient Selection: Thirty premature infants from eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units, of mean ± SD 26.4 ± 1.8 weeks of gestational age and 921 ± 177 g of birth weight. Methodology: Infants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting treatment mode of either nCPAP or nHFOV delivered by the ventilator CNO (Medin, Germany), using short binasal prongs of appropriate size. A crossover design with four 1-h treatment periods was used, such that each infant received both treatments twice. The primary outcome was the mean transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (TcCO2) value during the 2-h cumulative period of nHFOV compared with the 2-h cumulative period of nCPAP. Results: Significantly lower TcCO2 values were observed during nHFOV compared with nCPAP: 47.5 ± 7.6 versus 49.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.0007. A different TcCO2 behavior was found according to the random sequence: in patients starting on nCPAP, TcCO2 significantly decreased from 50.0 ± 8.0 to 46.6 ± 7.5 mmHg during nHFOV (P = 0.001). In patients starting on nHFOV, TcCO2 slightly increased from 48.5 ± 7.8 to 49.9 ± 6.7 mmHg during nCPAP (P = 0.13). Conclusions: nHFOV delivered through nasal prongs is more effective than nCPAP in improving the elimination of CO2.

References Powered by Scopus

Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants

1131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: Systematic review and meta-analysis

437Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates

435Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update

906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as respiratory support in preterm infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nasal High-Frequency Ventilation

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bottino, R., Pontiggia, F., Ricci, C., Gambacorta, A., Paladini, A., Chijenas, V., … Vento, G. (2018). Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial. Pediatric Pulmonology, 53(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

62%

Researcher 7

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 33

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

12%

Engineering 3

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free