Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background A hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hip fracture models of care to inform the development of an adaptable model of care for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods Multiple databases were searched for papers reporting a hip fracture model of care for any part of the patient pathway from injury to rehabilitation. Results were limited to publications from 2000. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened based on eligibility criteria. Papers were evaluated with an equity lens against eight conceptual criteria adapted from an existing description of a model of care. Results 82 papers were included, half of which were published since 2015. Only two papers were from middle-income countries and only two papers were evaluated as reporting all conceptual criteria from the existing description. The most identified criterion was an evidence-informed intervention and the least identified was the inclusion of patient stakeholders. Conclusion Interventions described as models of care for hip fracture are unlikely to include previously described conceptual criteria. They are most likely to be orthogeriatric approaches to service delivery, which is a barrier to their implementation in resource-limited settings. In LMICs, the provision of orthogeriatric competencies by other team members is an area for further investigation.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

18772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study

1125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applying an equity lens to interventions: Using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health

782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? A mixed methods systematic review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armstrong, E., Harvey, L. A., Payne, N. L., Zhang, J., Ye, P., Harris, I. A., … Ivers, R. Q. (2023, October 2). Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open Quality. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free