Multidimensional evaluation of all-cause mortality risk and survival analysis for hospitalized patients with COVID-19

4Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused over 3.8 million deaths globally. Up to date, the number of death in 2021 is more than that in 2020 globally. Here, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics of deceased patients and recovered patients, and analyze the risk factors of death to help reduce mortality of COVID-19. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 2719 COVID-19 patients were enrolled, including 109 deceased patients and 2610 recovered patients. Medical records of all patients were collected between February 4, 2020, and April 7, 2020. Clinical characteristics, laboratory indices, treatments, and deep-learning system-assessed lung lesion volumes were analyzed. The effect of different medications on survival time of fatal cases was also investigated. Results: The deceased patients were older (73 years versus 60 years) and had a male predominance. Nausea (10.1% versus 4.1%) and dyspnea (54.1% versus 39.2%) were more common in deceased patients. The proportion of patients with comorbidities in deceased patients was significantly higher than those in recovered patients. The median times from hospital admission to outcome in deceased patients and recovered patients were 9 days and 13 days, respectively. Patients with severe or critical COVID-19 were more frequent in deceased group. Leukocytosis (11.35×109/L versus 5.60×109/L) and lymphocytopenia (0.52×109/L versus 1.58×109/L) were shown in patients who died. The level of prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, D-dimer, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, urea, creatinine, creatine kinase, glucose, brain natriuretic peptide, and inflammatory indicators were significantly higher in deceased patients than in recovered patients. The volumes of ground-glass, consolidation, total lesions and total lung in all patients were quantified. Complications were more common in deceased patients than in recovered patients; respiratory failure (57.8%), septic shock (36.7%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (26.6%) were the most common complications in patients who died. Many treatments were more frequent in deceased patients, such as antibiotic therapy (88.1% versus 53.7%), glucocorticoid treatment (70.6% versus 11.0%), intravenous immunoglobin treatment (36.6% versus 4.9%), invasive mechanical ventilation (62.3% versus 3.8%). Antivirals, antibiotics, traditional Chinese medicines and glucocorticoid treatment may significantly increase the survival time of fatal cases. Quantitative computed tomography imaging results were correlated with biochemical markers. Conclusions: Most patients with fatal outcomes were more likely to have common comorbidities. The leading causes of death were respiratory failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure and septic shock were the most common serious complications. Antivirals, antibiotics, traditional Chinese medicines, and glucocorticoid treatment may prolong the survival time of deceased patients with COVID-19.

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

21502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019

20072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

19973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prognostic value of glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An AI-based radiomics nomogram for disease prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia using initial CT images and clinical indicators

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Septic shock in adults: guidelines of the All-Russian public organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists”

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Luo, H., Deng, G., Chang, J., Qiu, X., Liu, C., & Qin, B. (2021). Multidimensional evaluation of all-cause mortality risk and survival analysis for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 18(14), 3140–3149. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.58889

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Researcher 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

65%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

13%

Psychology 3

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free