The international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33): Multicenter validation and translation to Spanish

23Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) is a 33-item self administered outcome measure based on a Visual Analogue Scale response format designed for young and active population with hip pathology. The aim of the present study is to translate and validate the iHOT-33 into Spanish. Methods: 97 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included in this prospective and multicenter study performed between January 2012 and May 2014. Crosscultural adaptation was used to translate iHOT-33 into Spanish. Patients completed the questionnaire before and after surgery. Feasibility, reliability, internal consistency, construct validity (correlation with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), ceiling and floor effects and sensitivity to change were assessed for the present study. Results: Mean age was 48years old. Feasibility: 41.2% patients had no blank questions, and 71.3% of patients had fulfilled all but one or two questions. Reliability: ICC for the global questionnaire was 0.97, showing that the questionnaire is highly reproducible. Internal consistency: Cronbach's alpha was 0.98 for the global questionnaire. Construct validity: there was a high correlation with WOMAC (correlation coefficient >0.5). The Ceiling effect (taking into account the minimum detectable change) was 12.1% and the floor effect was 21.6%, for the global questionnaire. Large sensitivity to change was shown. Conclusion: the Spanish version of iHOT-33 has shown to be feasible, reliable and sensible to changes for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. This validated translation of iHOT-33 allows for comparisons between studies involving either Spanish- or English-speaking patients. Level of evidence: Prognostic study, Level I.

Figures

  • Table 1 Feasibility of the International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33); number of missing items registered within our questionnaires
  • Table 2 Mean scores at the 15-day test-retest questionnaires
  • Fig. 1 Bland-Altman plot for the studied scores of the iHOT-33
  • Table 3 Construct validity showing the correlations between International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) and WOMAC questionnaires

References Powered by Scopus

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

29420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19053Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

9084Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hip Arthroscopy in Patients Age 40 or Older: A Systematic Review

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: A review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hiprelated Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of a German version of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) according to the COSMIN checklist

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruiz-Ibán, M. A., Seijas, R., Sallent, A., Ares, O., Marín-Peña, O., Muriel, A., & Cuéllar, R. (2015). The international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33): Multicenter validation and translation to Spanish. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0255-z

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

61%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

18%

Researcher 7

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

24%

Sports and Recreations 3

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0