Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world—The Roskilde recommendations

20Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk—Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human-modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2-stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk-management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems. The authors encourage both cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk-assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk-management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human-modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk-management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:7–16. © 2016 SETAC.

References Powered by Scopus

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

11514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A safe operating space for humanity

8597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

7645Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying toxic impacts of metals potentially released during deep-sea mining-A synthesis of the challenges to quantifying risk

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changes in soil ecosystem structure and functions due to soil contamination

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Priorities and opportunities in the application of the ecosystem services concept in risk assessment for chemicals in the environment

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Selck, H., Adamsen, P. B., Backhaus, T., Banta, G. T., Bruce, P. K. H., Burton, G. A., … Chapman, P. M. (2017). Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world—The Roskilde recommendations. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 36(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3513

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

59%

Researcher 18

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 27

52%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

25%

Social Sciences 6

12%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free