Decline in macrolide resistance rates among Streptococcus pyogenes causing pharyngitis in children isolated in Italy

14Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Macrolides are often used to treat group A streptococcus (GAS) infections, but their resistance rates reached high proportions worldwide. The aim of the present study was to give an update on the characteristics and contemporary prevalence of macrolide-resistant pharyngeal GAS in Central Italy. A total of 592 isolates causing pharyngitis in children were collected in the period 2012–2013. Clonality was assessed by emm typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for all macrolide-resistant strains and for selected susceptible isolates. Genetic determinants of resistance were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Forty-four GAS were erythromycin-resistant (7.4 %). Among them, 52.3 % and 50 % were clindamycin- and tetracycline-resistant, respectively. erm(B)-positive isolates (52.3 %) expressed the constitutive cMLSB phenotype. mef(A) and its associated M phenotype were recorded in 40.9 % of the cases. The remaining erm(A)-positive isolates expressed the iMLSB phenotype. Seventeen tetracycline-resistant isolates carried tet(M) and five isolates carried tet(O). Twenty-five emm types were found among all strains, with the predominance of emm types 12, 89, 1, and 4. Eleven emm types and 12 PFGE clusters characterized macrolide-resistant strains, with almost two-thirds belonging to emm12, emm4, and emm11. Macrolide-susceptible and -resistant emm types 12, 89, 11, and 4 shared related PFGE profiles. There was a dramatic decline in macrolide resistance in Central Italy among pharyngeal GAS isolates in 2012–2013 when compared to previous studies from the same region (p < 0.05), although macrolide consumption remained stable over the past 15 years. We observed a decrease in the proportion of macrolide-resistant strains within emm types commonly associated with macrolide resistance in the past, namely emm12, 1, and 89.

Figures

  • Table 1 Annual and total prevalence of macrolide resistance genes and phenotypes within the 44 macrolide-resistant group A streptococcus (GAS)
  • Table 2 Cross tabulation of emm types, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) clustering, and genotypes/phenotypes of resistance for the 44 macrolide-resistant group A streptococcus (GAS) strains isolated in Italy (2012–2013)

References Powered by Scopus

Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis: Criteria for bacterial strain typing

7505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: A common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system

593Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of macrolide consumption on erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland in 1997-2001

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High prevalence of macrolide-resistance and molecular characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes isolates circulating in China from 2009 to 2016

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology of an upsurge of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ireland, 2012–2015

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution of macrolide resistance in streptococcus pyogenes over 14 years in an area of central italy

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gherardi, G., Petrelli, D., Di Luca, M. C., Pimentel de Araujo, F., Bernaschi, P., Repetto, A., … Vitali, L. A. (2015). Decline in macrolide resistance rates among Streptococcus pyogenes causing pharyngitis in children isolated in Italy. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 34(9), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2414-x

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

61%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

35%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

24%

Immunology and Microbiology 4

24%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0