Cluster–galaxy weak lensing

87Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies provides a direct probe of the projected matter distribution in and around galaxy clusters. Here, we present a self-contained pedagogical review of cluster–galaxy weak lensing, covering a range of topics relevant to its cosmological and astrophysical applications. We begin by reviewing the theoretical foundations of gravitational lensing from first principles, with a special attention to the basics and advanced techniques of weak gravitational lensing. We summarize and discuss key findings from recent cluster–galaxy weak-lensing studies on both observational and theoretical grounds, with a focus on cluster mass profiles, the concentration–mass relation, the splashback radius, and implications from extensive mass-calibration efforts for cluster cosmology.

References Powered by Scopus

Profiles of dark haloes: Evolution, scatter and environment

1911Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Weak gravitational lensing

1897Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Halo models of large scale structure

1716Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): Catalog of galaxy clusters and groups

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray observable-to-mass-and-redshift relations of galaxy clusters and groups with weak-lensing mass calibration from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program survey

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cosmological constraints from galaxy clusters and groups in the eROSITA final equatorial depth survey

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Umetsu, K. (2020, December 1). Cluster–galaxy weak lensing. Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-020-00129-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

61%

Researcher 11

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 35

92%

Mathematics 1

3%

Engineering 1

3%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free