Vaginal breech delivery: Results of a prospective registration study

44Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Most countries recommend planned cesarean section in breech deliveries, which is considered safer than vaginal delivery. As one of few countries in the western world Norway has continued to practice planned vaginal delivery in selected women. The aim of this study is to evaluate prospectively registered neonatal and maternal outcomes in term singleton breech deliveries in a Norwegian hospital during a ten years period. We aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in term breech pregnancies subjected either to planned vaginal or elective cesarean section.Methods: A prospective registration study including 568 women with term breech deliveries (>37 weeks) consecutively registered at Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand between 2001 and 2011. Fetal and maternal outcomes were compared according to delivery method; planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section.Results: Of 568 women, elective cesarean section was planned in 279 (49%) cases and vaginal delivery was planned in 289 (51%) cases. Acute cesarean section was performed in 104 of the planned vaginal deliveries (36.3%). There were no neonatal deaths. Two cases of serious neonatal morbidity were reported in the planned vaginal group. One infant had seizures, brachial plexus injury, and cephalhematoma. The other infant had 5-minutes Apgar < 4. Twenty-nine in the planned vaginal group (10.0%) and eight in the planned cesarean section group (2.9%) (p < 0.001) were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit. However, only one infant was admitted for ≥4 days. According to follow-up data (median six years) none of these infants had long-term sequelae. Regarding maternal morbidity, blood loss was the only variable that was significantly higher in the planned cesarean section group versus in the vaginal delivery group (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Strict guidelines were followed in all cases. There were no neonatal deaths. Two infants had serious neonatal morbidity in the planned vaginal group without long-term sequelae. © 2013 Vistad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial

1679Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery

751Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Birthweight by gestational age in Norway

474Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Management of Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20b

0
132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: A meta-analysis including observational studies

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans?

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vistad, I., Cvancarova, M., Hustad, B. L., & Henriksen, T. (2013). Vaginal breech delivery: Results of a prospective registration study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-153

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

68%

Researcher 11

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 65

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

3%

Psychology 2

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 17

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free