Working together: A study of civil society partnerships between WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) and GESI (gender equality and social inclusion) organisations in Timor-Leste

4Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article reports on an empirical study conducted in Timor-Leste that explored the drivers, benefits, and challenges of partnerships and collaborations between water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) organisations as integral parts of the WASH system. The research design was primarily qualitative and included a data-collection workshop with 30 representatives from 16 civil society organisations (CSOs) in Dili, longitudinal research involving two rounds of semi-structured interviews over 2.5 years with five organisations, and semi-structured interviews with an additional 18 CSOs. We applied a framework of post-development theory, including critical localism and working contingently. Key drivers to form partnerships were found to be the identification of community WASH service gaps and the alignment of advocacy agendas. Key benefits reported were increased inclusion and empowerment outcomes and strengthened organisational knowledge and capacity. Challenges emerge when organisations' key staff change, strategies misalign, and financial and administrative capabilities differ. The study contributes practical insights into how civil society organisations (CSOs) partner to strengthen mutual WASH and GESI strategies and programmes and their outcomes. We recommend strengthening the partnerships between WASH and GESI organisations in ways that are cognisant of power dynamics, local priorities, and capacity needs and promote longevity and continuity through ownership of decisions at the local level. Our findings suggest that meaningful, reciprocal, and respectful engagement with WASH and GESI organisations enables WASH programmes to be in a better position to address the harmful norms that drive inequitable behaviours, thus strengthening localism, and the WASH governance system overall.

References Powered by Scopus

How Many Interviews Are Enough to Identify Metathemes in Multisited and Cross-cultural Research? Another Perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study

347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surplus possibilities: Postdevelopment and community economies

231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding

198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Integrating the quintuple helix approach into atmospheric microplastics management policies for planetary health preservation

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying parameters impacting WASH STEM education across the globe

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Locally Led Opportunities for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Climate Change and Gender Equality Partnerships in the Blue Pacific

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, M. L., Nguyen, T. T., Vieira, A., Niner, S. L., & Roche, C. (2023). Working together: A study of civil society partnerships between WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) and GESI (gender equality and social inclusion) organisations in Timor-Leste. Frontiers in Water, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1047955

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

33%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

38%

Engineering 5

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

15%

Environmental Science 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free