Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based audiometry for hearing loss detection: Meta-analysis

23Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common disabilities worldwide and affects both individual and public health. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) is the gold standard for hearing assessment, but it is often not available in many settings, given its high cost and demand for human resources. Smartphone-based audiometry may be equally effective and can improve access to adequate hearing evaluations. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the current evidence of the role of smartphone-based audiometry in hearing assessments and further explore the factors that influence its diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Five databases-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-were queried to identify original studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of hearing loss measurement using smartphone-based devices with conventional PTA as a reference test. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The factors associated with diagnostic accuracy were identified using a bivariate meta-regression model. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Results: In all, 25 studies with a total of 4470 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for smartphone-based audiometry were 89% (95% CI 83%-93%), 93% (95% CI 87%-97%), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.97), respectively; the corresponding values for the smartphone-based speech recognition test were 91% (95% CI 86%-94%), 88% (95% CI 75%-94%), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that patient age, equipment used, and the presence of soundproof booths were significantly related to diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: We have presented comprehensive evidence regarding the effectiveness of smartphone-based tests in diagnosing hearing loss. Smartphone-based audiometry may serve as an accurate and accessible approach to hearing evaluations, especially in settings where conventional PTA is unavailable .

References Powered by Scopus

Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission

6367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

2623Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

2394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Web- and app-based tools for remote hearing assessment: a scoping review

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Build-in sensors and analysis algorithms aided smartphone-based sensors for point-of-care tests

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, C. H., Lin, H. Y. H., Wang, M. C., Chu, Y. C., Chang, C. Y., Huang, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. F. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based audiometry for hearing loss detection: Meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/28378

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

55%

Researcher 10

34%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 12

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

37%

Computer Science 3

11%

Engineering 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0