Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades

368Citations
Citations of this article
494Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The beneficial effects of learners interacting in online programmes have been widely reported. Indeed, online discussion is argued to promote student-centred learning. It is therefore reasonable to suggest that the benefits of online discussion should translate into improved student performance. The current study examined the frequency of online interaction of 122 undergraduates and compared this with their grades at the end of the year. The findings revealed that greater online interaction did not lead to significantly higher performance for students achieving passing grades; however, students who failed in their courses tended to interact less frequently. Other factors that may be salient in online interactions are discussed. © British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks

518Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Virtual discussion: Understanding college students' electronic bulletin board use

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distributed teamwork: the impact of communication media on influence and decision quality

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning

850Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Engaging with massive online courses

440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review

327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 178

61%

Lecturer / Post doc 56

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 38

13%

Researcher 21

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 112

46%

Computer Science 71

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 35

14%

Psychology 25

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free