Cecal intubation rates in different eras of endoscopic technological development

8Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy plays a critical role in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and has been widely regarded as the gold standard. Cecal intubation rate (CIR) is one of the well-defined quality indicators used to assess colonoscopy. Aim: To assess the impact of new technologies on the quality of colonoscopy by assessing completion rates. Material and methods: This was a dual-center study at the 2nd Department of Surgery at Jagiellonian University Medical College and at the Specialist Center “Medicina” in Krakow, Poland. The CIR and cecal intubation time (CIT) in three different eras of technological advancement were determined. The study enrolled 27 463 patients who underwent colonoscopy as part of a national CRC screening program. The patients were divided into three groups: group I – 3408 patients examined between 2000 and 2003 (optical endoscopes); group II – 10 405 patients examined between 2004 and 2008 (standard electronic endoscopes); and group III – 13 650 patients examined between 2009 and 2014 (modern endoscopes). Results: There were statistically significant differences in the CIR between successive eras. The CIR in group I (2000–2003) was 69.75%, in group II (2004–2008) was 92.32%, and in group III (2009–2014) was 95.17%. The mean CIT was significantly reduced in group III. Conclusions: Our study shows that the technological innovation of novel endoscopy devices has a great influence on the effectiveness of the CRC screening program. The new era of endoscopic technological development has the potential to reduce examination-related patient discomfort, obviate the need for sedation and increase diagnostic yields.

References Powered by Scopus

Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline From the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

1785Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality indicators for colonoscopy

483Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Control System Incorporated with Deep Learning Improved Endoscopist Performance in a Pretest and Post-Test Trial

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal timing of a colonoscopy screening schedule depends on adenoma detection, adenoma risk, adherence to screening and the screening objective: A microsimulation study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matyja, M., Pasternak, A., Szura, M., Pędziwiatr, M., Major, P., & Rembiasz, K. (2018). Cecal intubation rates in different eras of endoscopic technological development. Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne, 13(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.74341

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

56%

Engineering 4

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Computer Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free