Examining the “Weak Field” of Adult Education

6Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Against the background of internal developments of adult education as a field of study, and new external conditions for research, this chapter examines how the configuration of adult education research has been evolving, particularly over the last decade. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concept of the scientific field, we argue that adult education is a “weak” field. Our findings suggest that the field is facing three main challenges. First, the regional fragmentation of the field that was noticed at the end of the 1990s, has continued and seems to have intensified. Second, a disciplinary fragmentation and “hollowing out” of the field can be observed. Third, we note a disconnect between academic adult education research and policy-related research. We provide a couple of speculations as to the future of adult education as a field of study, with a particular focus on the issue of policy relevance, which is contested among adult educators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubenson, K., & Elfert, M. (2019). Examining the “Weak Field” of Adult Education. In Lifelong Learning Book Series (Vol. 24, pp. 15–31). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10946-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free