Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Systems

338Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In mobile edge computing systems, an edge node may have a high load when a large number of mobile devices offload their tasks to it. Those offloaded tasks may experience large processing delay or even be dropped when their deadlines expire. Due to the uncertain load dynamics at the edge nodes, it is challenging for each device to determine its offloading decision (i.e., whether to offload or not, and which edge node it should offload its task to) in a decentralized manner. In this work, we consider non-divisible and delay-sensitive tasks as well as edge load dynamics, and formulate a task offloading problem to minimize the expected long-term cost. We propose a model-free deep reinforcement learning-based distributed algorithm, where each device can determine its offloading decision without knowing the task models and offloading decision of other devices. To improve the estimation of the long-term cost in the algorithm, we incorporate the long short-term memory (LSTM), dueling deep Q-network (DQN), and double-DQN techniques. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithm can better exploit the processing capacities of the edge nodes and significantly reduce the ratio of dropped tasks and average delay when compared with several existing algorithms.

References Powered by Scopus

77546Citations
26299Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Fog computing and its role in the internet of things

5192Citations
2979Readers

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
218Citations
83Readers
Get full text
197Citations
70Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, M., & Wong, V. W. S. (2022). Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21(6), 1985–1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2020.3036871

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Researcher 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 31

74%

Engineering 9

21%

Social Sciences 1

2%

Physics and Astronomy 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0