Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: From theory to practice

18Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In several countries, health care policies gear toward strengthening the position of primary care physicians. Primary care physicians are increasingly expected to take accountability for overall spending and quality. Yet traditional models of paying physicians do not provide adequate incentives for taking on this new role. Under a so-called shared savings program physicians are instead incentivized to take accountability for spending and quality, as the program lets them share in cost savings when quality targets are met. We provide a structured approach to designing a shared savings program for primary care, and apply this approach to the design of a shared savings program for a Dutch chain of primary care providers, which is currently being piloted. Methods: Based on the literature, we defined five building blocks of shared savings models that encompass the definition of the scope of the program, the calculation of health care expenditures, the construction of a savings benchmark, the assessment of savings and the rules and conditions under which savings are shared. We apply insights from a variety of literatures to assess the relative merits of alternative design choices within these building blocks. The shared savings program uses an econometric model of provider expenditures as an input to calculating a casemix-corrected benchmark. Results: The minimization of risk and uncertainty for both payer and provider is pertinent to the design of a shared savings program. In that respect, the primary care setting provides a number of unique opportunities for achieving cost and quality targets. Accountability can more readily be assumed due to the relatively long-lasting relationships between primary care physicians and patients. A stable population furthermore improves the confidence with which savings can be attributed to changes in population management. Challenges arise from the institutional context. The Dutch health care system has a fragmented structure and providers are typically small in size. Conclusion: Shared savings programs fit the concept of enhanced primary care. Incorporating a shared savings program into existing payment models could therefore contribute to the financial sustainability of this organizational form.

References Powered by Scopus

Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics

3353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies

3116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom

624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How evolving United States payment models influence primary care and its impact on the quadruple aim

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Redesigning care delivery with patient support personnel: Learning from accountable care organizations

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perceived barriers and facilitators of structural reimbursement for remote patient monitoring, an exploratory qualitative study

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayen, A. P., Van Den Berg, M. J., Meijboom, B. R., Struijs, J. N., & Westert, G. P. (2015). Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: From theory to practice. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1250-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

71%

Researcher 7

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 15

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

13%

Social Sciences 4

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1949

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free