Persuasive pressures in the adoption of E-government

3Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the diffusion of personalized services among municipalities in the Netherlands over the period 2006-2010 and investigate how and why various municipalities adopted personalized electronic services. Using qualitative data gathered in fifty interviews in ten selected Dutch municipalities, we synthesize the findings in an explanatory model of personalized electronic service delivery diffusion. The model shows how persuasive pressure (as perceived by adopters) is followed-up by organizational search activities, and how, in various circumstances, the idea of personalized services is ‘framed’ by innovation champions, knowledge brokers and new members of staff as to appeal to specific organizational priorities and ambitions. In doing so, this article contributes to an institutional view on adoption and diffusion of innovations, in which (1) horizontal and vertical channels of persuasion and (2) human agency, rather than technological opportunity and rational cost-benefit considerations, account for actual diffusion of innovations.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The critical factors affecting e-government adoption in indonesia: A conceptual framework

52Citations
374Readers

A conceptual study on generic end users adoption of e-government services

13Citations
90Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Homburg, V., & Dijkshoorn, A. (2013). Persuasive pressures in the adoption of E-government. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 402, pp. 391–406). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_24

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

38%

Social Sciences 5

21%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0