New evidence on causal relationship between approximate number system (ANS) acuity and arithmetic ability in elementary-school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis

21Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Approximate number system (ANS) acuity and mathematical ability have been found to be closely associated in recent studies. However, whether and how these two measures are causally related still remain less addressed. There are two hypotheses about the possible causal relationship: ANS acuity influences mathematical performances, or access to math education sharpens ANS acuity. Evidences in support of both hypotheses have been reported, but these two hypotheses have never been tested simultaneously. Therefore, questions still remain whether only one-direction or reciprocal causal relationships existed in the association. In this work, we provided a new evidence on the causal relationship between ANS acuity and arithmetic ability. ANS acuity and mathematical ability of elementary-school students were measured sequentially at three time points within one year, and all possible causal directions were evaluated simultaneously using cross-lagged regression analysis. The results show that ANS acuity influences later arithmetic ability while the reverse causal direction was not supported. Our finding adds a strong evidence to the causal association between ANS acuity and mathematical ability, and also has important implications for educational intervention designed to train ANS acuity and thereby promote mathematical ability.

Figures

  • TABLE 1 | Demographic information of participants.
  • FIGURE 1 | (A) Schematic of the dot-array comparison task used to measure Approximate Number System (ANS) acuity of participants. (B) An example of multiplication task used to measure arithmetic ability of participants.
  • FIGURE 2 | Four-cross-lagged models used to fit the data. (A–D) Refer to Model 1, Model 2, Model 3 and Model 4, respectively.
  • TABLE 2 | Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and correlation matrix of Approximate Number System (ANS) acuity and arithmetic ability of participants at three time points (T1, T2, and T3).
  • TABLE 3 | Summary fit statistics for the four cross-lagged models.
  • FIGURE 3 | The fitted optimal cross-lagged model (M2) with standardized path coefficients. The numbers attached to the arrows were standardized path coefficients, with sig errors in the brackets.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement

1159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developmental Change in the Acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-Year-Olds and Adults

718Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bidirectional, Longitudinal Associations Between Math Ability and Approximate Number System Precision in Childhood

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of approximate number system in different mathematics skills across grades

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Associations of magnitude comparison and number line estimation with mathematical competence: A comparative review

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, Y., Zhou, X., Shi, D., Song, H., Zhang, H., & Shi, J. (2016). New evidence on causal relationship between approximate number system (ANS) acuity and arithmetic ability in elementary-school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUL). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01052

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2407142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 20

69%

Social Sciences 6

21%

Neuroscience 2

7%

Physics and Astronomy 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0