Visions for development and management of urban green and blue infrastructure: a citizen's perspective

11Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ongoing urbanization leads to problems such as densification, loss of biodiversity, and social injustice in cities. For increasing urban populations, green–blue infrastructure (GBI) is an important element in compact cities contributing to human health, well-being, and the provision of important ecosystem services. We analyzed responses from two open-ended questions about visions, ideas, and topics for the development and management of GBI important for citizens of the city of Leipzig, Germany. The questions were part of an online survey accompanying the development of the local GBI planning strategy: Master Plan Green. The strategy is focusing on five guiding themes that are leading local and global debates about sustainable and resilient cities: biodiversity, climate adaptation, environmental justice, health, and sustainable mobility. We categorize citizens' ideas and suggestions, summarize frequent problems and conflicts, and link ideas and visions to the five guiding themes. As the last step, we discuss citizens' suggestions in order to minimize conflicts in GBI and to identify deficits in present local planning. Major problems and conflicts that were addressed by respondents relate to quality, usability, other users, activities, and safety and security of GBI. Numerous suggestions aimed to tackle these problems, for example, by designating separate use areas, adding naturalness, improving maintenance, and enhancing facilities. A range of ideas and suggestions were based on diverging expectations underpinning the challenge of matching heterogeneous demands of GBI users in an equitable fashion. Linking these suggestions to the five guiding themes reveals that most ideas are covered by one or several guiding themes and are considered in local planning strategies. However, findings also demonstrate that increasing the quantity of Leipzig's GBI is a central request from respondents. Sociocultural and economic aspects as well as conflicting demands among citizens should further be central to GBI planning to avoid injustice and achieve sustainability objectives. This analysis gives insights into opinions and visions of citizens regarding the development of the city's GBI network and thus substantiates major strategic and planning themes leading global and local urban strategies toward sustainable cities. Considering specific suggestions and GBI deficits that bother citizens on a local level, offers the opportunity to improve the social and ecological resilience of GBI.

References Powered by Scopus

Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities 'just green enough'

2914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecosystem services in urban areas

2113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review

2016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Urban parks as an important component of environmental infrastructure: Biodiversity conservation and recreational opportunities

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How Does Blue Infrastructure Affect the Attractiveness Rating of Residential Areas? Case Study of Olsztyn City, Poland

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phytoremediation as an urban paradigm in promoting the health-potential of small green areas.

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palliwoda, J., Haase, A., Suppee, C., Rink, D., & Priess, J. A. (2022). Visions for development and management of urban green and blue infrastructure: a citizen’s perspective. Ecology and Society, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13129-270208

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 7

33%

Social Sciences 6

29%

Arts and Humanities 6

29%

Design 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free